1 英会話の練習方法が分かる「英会話小説本」 (Res : 1)
- 1名前：Aoi 投稿日：2017/03/15(水) 19:14:33
- こんにちは。
みなさん、英会話ってネイティブがいないとできないと思っていませんか？そして、ネイティブとレッスンをしていても、
上達を感じない人はいませんか？どうすれば英語が「使える」ようになるか。多分、これは習ったことがないんですね。
もちろん、英語の勉強方法について、いろいろとハウツー本があります。でも、一度これを読んでみてください。
今後、どうやって英語を勉強していくか、何かのヒントになるはずです。
「もしも高校四年生があったら、英語を話せるようになるか」（幻冬舎、金沢優）
- 1名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/10/14(金) 09:09:53
- トピ：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "Universities should give the same amount of money to their students’ sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion."
This is a difficult question and it does not have a clear answer. Some people would agree with that universities should give the same amount of money to their students’ sports activities as they give to their university libraries, while other people would disagree with this topic. Personally, I agree with this topic for the following three reasons.
First of all, spend more money to sports activities will meet students' need. Japanese universities generally have less sports class compare to normal class. When I was still a university student, my university only offered few classes that I could move my body, and all of it was about gymnastics. It was very boring for me, so if I want to have some extra exercize. I often went to a city gym. City gym was not very near to my university, it takes me one and half hours by bicycle. You can say, why you didn't go city gym with other transportation methods? I live in a small and rural city in Japan, there was few buses. In addition to this, I don't have a car. It was quiet inconvenience for me to work out at a city gym. If my university can offer some interesting sports activities such as basketball, tennis and so on. Not only for me, many other students will be appreciate for that.
The second reason is that more sports activities will improve students physical strength. From what I have mentioned in my first reason. Japanese universities generally have less sports class compare to normal class. This will cause unbalance. Many of my friends are obese. My major was computer science and many students in this field are introvert person. They prefer to stay indoor instead of go out and play some sports games. I can say that they are typical computer nerd. If universities want to students be good not only toward to their academic study, but also towards to their daily life. Universities should spend more money to increase students' sports activities.
Last but not the least, more sports activities can improve students' interpersonal skill and make students' school life more colorful and memorable. In my opinion, if universities can spend money to build a comprehensive university gym, gym which contains running machines, pool, tennis coat, basketball coat, etc,. It can gather a lot of students and university gym will be a good place for students to interact with each other. I said my major was computer science and many students' interpersonal skill was not good. So it definitely can improve many students' interpersonal skill. And we can share our common interest and information in an open space. We can enjoy our conversation and stimulate to each other. This kind of relationship is really helpful towards our academic endeavor. Such kind of experience will allow a lot of student' feel their school life was colorful and memorable.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, I think academic research is needed for universities. However, universities should give the same amount of money to their students’ sports activities as they give to their university libraries to improve students' campus life.(525 words)
- 2名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/10/14(金) 09:27:41
- トピ；In some courses, there are numerous exams throughout the course, while in other courses there is only one final exam. Discuss the advantages of each type of course. Then indicate which you prefer and why.
In my point of view, I prefer to choose courses there is only one final exam. There are a lot of opinion for me to for or against this topic. I want to mention my opinion in the following reasons.
First of all, I want to argue the advantages of each type of courses. Talk about course which offers numerous exams. I think the only advantage is that there is no need for most students to worry about their academic record, because it will not be decided for just only one test. Even they have bad tests scores for their tests once or twice, there is still a lot of chance for them to have good scores in later tests because of there are numerous exams throughout the course. On the other hand, numerous exams means they have to use much time for upcoming tests' preparation. It must be arduous for them. Next, talk about couse which offers only one final exam. It will be helpful for many students because there is only one test. Because of just one exam, students can spend more time on different subject and when the test schedule is close, they just focus on the test and study a lot then do their best effort in the test, and finish it. There is no need for students to study everyday.
Some people may say they will feel a lot of pressure because only one final exam will decide their academic record. However, in my point of view, take numerous exams will make you feel more pressure. When I was still a university student, I have many subjects for my graduation. And there is a subject, I remember it was discrete mathematics, I have to take a little check test per every lecture. It was really embarrassing to me because I have to study every week. Sometimes I just forgot about the upcoming little check test and had bad scores. This made me feel a lot of pressure because I have to prepare for the upcoming test everyweeks. Through this kind of experience, I definitely want to choose the courses which offer only one final exam.
In addition to this, I think only one final exam can also easy teachers' daily work. If teachers have to make numerous exams, it must be a big burden for them. Instead of making numerous exam papers, many teachers at universities, I mean professors should spend more time on their own research. Its professors duty to make a good lecture, but good lecture not depends on the number of the test, it depends on the quality of the test. It's better for professors to improve the quality of test than increase the number of tests.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, although only one final exam will make more students feel nervous, its merits exceed its demerits. And it can not only makes students save their time, but also can save their professors' precious time. In my point of view, I think its better for me to choose courses which offer only one final exam. (518 words)
- 3名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/10/14(金) 10:07:57
- トピ：The reading passage and the lecture both deal with smart cars.
While the author presents three arguments to support it, the lecturer makes counterarguments against them.
First, the reading passage argues that smart cars will prevent many accidents, thereby saving lives.
However, according to the lecture, technology advancement will failed occasionally. Smart cars will cause more accidents. The cars will be packed more tightly on the roads. And when accidents occurred it will pileups and involved more cars, this will make the accidents more serious.
Second, the reading passage mentions that with the use of smart cars, traffic problems will practically disappear.
On the other hand, the lecturer points out that when driving become more convenient, more and more people will decide to drive because they expect an easier driving experience. And this will cause traffic congestion and people can't decrease their commuting time.
Third, the reading passage says that smart cars will bring a reduction in the costs of driving.
But the lecturer questions the validity of this opinion, he says that it's not reasonable to expect that smart cars will save drivers money. The advanced technology of smart cars will make repairs to them more expensive than repairs on conventional automobiles.
Thus, in the opinion of the lecturer, the main argument of the passage proves wrong.
- 4名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/10/15(土) 18:29:33
- トピ
1.abscond-> to depart, clandestinely; to steal off and hide
2.aberrant-> deviating rom the norm
3.alacrity -> eager and enthusiastic willingness
4.approbation-> an expression of approval or praise; recommendation
5.assuage-> to ease or lesson; to appease or pacify
6.audacious-> daring and gearless; recklessly bold
7.austere -> without adornment;bare;secerely simple;ascetic
8.axiomatic-> taken as a given; possessing self-evident truth
9.canonical-> following or in agreement with accepted, traditional standard
10.capricious-> inclined to change one's mind impulsively; erratic,unpredictable
11.censure-> to criticize severely; to officially rebuke
12.chicanery -> trickery or subterfuge
13.connoisseur ->an informed and astute judge in matters of taste; expert
14.convoluted -> complex or complicated
（省略されました・・全てを読むにはここを押してください）
- 5名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/10/22(土) 18:42:32
- トピ
fulminate
ingenuous
inured
irascible
laud
lucid
magnanimity
martial
mundane
nescent
neologism
noxious
abtuse
abviate
（省略されました・・全てを読むにはここを押してください）
- 6名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/10/22(土) 19:03:25
- トピ
abate
accolade
adulation
aesthetic
ascetic
avarice
axiom
bucolic
cacophony
canon
castigation
caustic
chary
cogent
（省略されました・・全てを読むにはここを押してください）
- 7名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/10/23(日) 09:20:12
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
トピ：
Some people contend that innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students whereas others argue that these technologies all too often distract from real learning. Admittedly, both ideas are equally important and, in fact, history informs us that these two approaches are mutually exclusive. However, as far as study in today's Japan is concerned, I believe that innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students is more crucial.
The chief reason for my assertion lies in the evolutionary improvements of technology. If we analyze how technology affect our daily life, we would have a certain level of agreement that today's societal system is much more efficient and convenient than ever before, and the reason for this is that technological advancement. In such society where video, computers, and the Internet became daily must items, pursuing the ideal tools for studying, we can use these hi-tech gadgets
However, using computers and the Internet for students' study often can distract them from real learning. As a matter of fact, some students use Internet to talk with their friends and playing computer games instead of real learning.
It must be obvious to anyone's eyes that scientific technologies have good effect towards learning and if we analyze the usage of hi-tech gadgets depends on teachers' teaching style and students' personality, we realize that the problem is not come from these technologies, but come from other factors. This is the reason why I insist that innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet didn't distract students from their real learning. Let us consider two reasons to further verify this assertion.
The first reason is that in order to avoid students' distraction from real learning, teachers should cooperate with students' parents. Learning at school is just part of students' study. After school, students tends to play together with their friends. If their friends are not very enthusiastic towards study, they will have bad effect. Thus, teachers should have to have connection with students' parents and keenly aware of students' problem. Predict what will happen in the future and make wise plans for the students' future study.
I next turn to the reasons of students' own personality. Every children have their own personality. Teachers should not teach every students with common method. Some students will distracted by the hi-tech gadgets, while others won't. Teachers should know the goodness and badness talents of the students. And always try to inspire them with great imagination and intelligence.
（省略されました・・全てを読むにはここを押してください）
- 8名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/10/24(月) 07:16:46
- impecunious 無一文の、貧乏の
incipient はじまりの、初期の
inert 不発な、怠慢な
innocuous 無害の
intransigent 妥協しない、頑固な
inveigle 誘い込む、篭絡する
morose むっつりした、不機嫌な
odious 憎らしい、いやな
opaque 不透明な
oscillation ふり、揺れ
penurious ひどくケチな、乏しい
pernicious 致命的な
peruse 熟読する
pious 信心深い
precursor 先駆者
（省略されました・・全てを読むにはここを押してください）
- 1名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/16(金) 23:12:56
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books.
"We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening the café would attract more customers. Space could be made for the café by discontinuing the children's book section, which will probably become less popular given that the most recent national census indicated a significant decline in the percentage of the population under age ten. Opening a café will allow Monarch to attract more customers and better compete with Regal Books, which recently opened its own café."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
トピAnswer:
The Board of Directors's claim that opening a café will allow Monarch to attract more customers and better compete with Regal Books, which recently opened its own café contains several logical flaws, and lends little credibility. Rather than relying solely on groundless reasoning, the reporter needs to consider the following points before making a final conclusion.
- 5名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/17(土) 01:01:05
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe.
"A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, the proposed new jazz club in Monroe, the C-Note, would have the local market all to itself. Plus, jazz is extremely popular in Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe's annual jazz festival last summer; several well-known jazz musicians live in Monroe; and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is 'Jazz Nightly,' which airs every weeknight at 7 P.M. Finally, a nationwide study indicates that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
トピAnswer:
The developers' claim that a jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, the proposed new jazz club in Monroe, the C-Note, would have the local market all to itself. contains several logical flaws, and lends little credibility. Rather than relying solely on groundless reasoning, the reporter needs to consider the following points before making a final conclusion.
First and foremost, the whole reasoning of the report is based upon an assumption that the jazz fun's population in Monroe will remain stable, and the number of people participating Monroe's annual jazz festival. Let us think about a situation where the population of the Monroe is decreasing each year by 0.8 fold. Despite the fact that ,
- 6名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/17(土) 07:39:55
- トピAnswer:
The developers' claim that a jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, the proposed new jazz club in Monroe, the C-Note, would have the local market all to itself contains several logical flaws, and lends little credibility. Rather than relying solely on groundless reasoning, the reporter needs to consider the following points before making a final conclusion.
First and foremost, the whole reasoning of the developers is based upon an assumption that the jazz fans' population will not change much over time. Let us think about a situation where the population of the jazz fans' is decreasing each year by 0.8 fold. Despite the fact that jazz is extremely popular in Monroe, the decrease in population will obviously lead to an total decrease of the total jass profit in Monroe in the end. Situations like this would weaken the validity of the developers' claim, and in order to verify the claim, detailed investigation on this point must be addressed.
Second, although the developers mentioned that jazz is extremely popular in Monroe, he or she did not touch types of people of lives in the place such as students, working generation and so on. The reporter must be aware of the fact that if a much larger amount of jazz fans' population is students. It is true that students will be fans of jazz music. However, after several years their attention will toward into another hobbies because they can't keep their sustainability. If further investigation of what types of people consis jazz fans showed that such other types of people's can keep their sustainability toward jazz, then, the reporter's claim would become more convincing.
Third, the developers insisted that according to nationwide study, it indicates that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment. The result was nationalwaide. Thus, it can't represents Monroe's jazz fans' tendency. In addition to this, developers didn't show any history of a jazz company in Monroe and bench mark from old companies who had the same line of business. It is obvious that there are many factors that can make this argument more plausible. If more through investigations indicate that opening a new jazz club in Monroe will be tremendously profitable, the developers' claim may become more persuasive.
Fourth, the developers assumes that the result of a jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Whether this trend is the indication of the jazz music clubs tendency or simply a temporary trend is not clear. At least, at this point, it is too soon to conclude that this trend is due to jazz is extremely popular in Monroe.
As discussed above, the developers' claim is based on several assumptions that are not sufficiently supported. Before arriving at the final conclusion, the reporter should acknowledge that there are many factors that are involved in this story, and undertake additional investigation to clarify the uncertainties pointed out above.(511 words)
- 7名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/18(日) 07:53:59
- トピClaim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
- 8名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/18(日) 07:54:44
- トピ
The topic claims that the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the people that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models. Basically, I agree with this claim insofar as the term heroes or role models indicates the society's highest ideals. The term heroes or role models tends to be interpreted in many different ways such as political leaders or religious leaders; therefore, defining the term is of vital importance in order to avoid rambling discussion. Having defined the term, it is now clear that a political leader or a religious leader reveal a society's highest ideals. Indeed, if we look around with unprejudiced eye, we notice that the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the society's highest ideals .
The chief reason for my agreement with this topic is as follows: family is the smallest unit of society. However, character of people depends on their upbringing and how they are brought up in their society. In other words, the way they react to situations or how they act what they believe in is reflection of how they were saw by the society.
It must be obvious to anyone's eyes that character of the society's highest ideals have big influence towards their society. And if we analyze how the society's highest ideals influence the character of a society, we realize that they influence people by their personalities and behavior. They can change the character of a society. This is the reason why I insist that the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the society's highest ideals. Let us consider two examples to further verify this assertion.
The first example is George W.Bush. He started War in Afghanistan and Iraq War for the revenge of the September 11 attacks. He was aggressive and try to show America's strength towards any other countries around the world. But the Afghanistan and Iraq War has only cause the world to be more chaos. There is apparently no one gained profit during the war, only mass of death. President George W.Bush can fully express the character of America. They want to show off their power and make them the strongest country among any other countries.
I next turn to the example of Mother Teresa. She is the first nun who roamed the world and she is doing good especially to children and spreading her kindness and love all over the world. She is also a role model of Christian societies and uplift the belief of people to do good by showing us how it should be done. Not only Christian societies impressed by her kindness and love, but also people do not have religious belief take her as a role model.
In summary, I would like to stress that the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the society's highest ideals. Political leaders, religious leaders, famous celebrities, etc., each kind of person could be the society's highest ideals. Without the society's highest ideals, people will lose their direction and the society would be chaos. Thus, the society's highest ideals not only represent the character of a society, but they also needed by ordinal citizens.(569 words)
- 9名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/18(日) 16:44:04
- トピ
Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
- 10名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/18(日) 16:44:51
- トピInformation, especially what must be taught and how, is vital concern to society. Some visionaries, including this topic, speak of a world in which any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future. I agree with this topic that much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. However, I am not deaf to the merits of the information brings to us, and I, therefore, insist that concepts of both information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted or trusted must be weighed appropriately.
To begin with, one reason for my fundamental agreement with this topic is as follows: in order for people to acquire proper information, the source of information and how people accept the information must be made clear. Simply put, information exists among people in an organization or society where the members share common interest or goals. Although examples can be presented in a plethora of ways, two that aptly illustrate this point involve the areas of politics.
Consider first a case of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted. Political leaders tend to manipulate citizens for their politics decisions. In Japan, during World War II, Japanese emperor decided to participate in the war and agitate his people through mass media. After World War II his decision be proven false. Much the same kind of incidents can be happen in other country. Julian Paul Assange leaked many top secrets about United States' diploma, which referred to as a fact, but prove to be false after the leak. It is clear as shown by these two examples that information was distorted by mass media and government.
I believe, as stated above, that information referred to as a fact should be trusted is the very foundation upon which citizens can acquire information easily and directly. However, I insist that one must embrace the principle that citizens should not believe mass media directly and they should search many information about the situation by themselves. It is important that each individual learns the fact that both mistrusted or trusted constitute information offered by mass media or government, and bereft of one of the two, no full-fledged information can be fostered, let alone accomplished.
Why might this be so? The simple answer is this: no longer does it make sense to think of the notions of mistrusted or trusted information as separate entities, for they coexist in society, inextricably bound with each other. If one were to return to the mass media example discussed above, a rationale of my assertion becomes clearer.
Any mass media, whether it is a news paper or a news TV program, operate their business in an environment in which a certain degree of competition exists. To sell their own products, they must outmaneuver competitors. Exaggeration, embellish a story, make up a news report, they use these ways to attractive more viewers; there are various ways by which they can excel in the field of their business. But mass media needs to broadcast trusted information as well as mistrusted one. For example, scientific invention, Olympic games and so on.
In sum, instilling a concept of information into citizens for certain purpose may look bad. This is true and on this point, I agree with this topic. However, focusing solely on the mistrusted information is fallacious within the framework of a broader perspective, especially in a pluralistic society where monistic approaches fail to solve a given problem. I do not think any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, nor do I think that information referred to as a fact should be trusted. It's depends on the mess media or government to how to represent the information and how citizens' personality.(640 words)
- 11名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/18(日) 22:43:23
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
トピ：
Some people contend that innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students whereas others argue that these technologies all too often distract from real learning. Admittedly, both ideas are equally important and, in fact, history informs us that these two approaches are mutually exclusive. However, as far as study in today's Japan is concerned, I believe that innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students is more crucial.
The chief reason for my assertion lies in the evolutionary improvements of technology. If we analyze how technology affect our daily life, we would have a certain level of agreement that today's society system is much more efficient and convenience than ever before, and the reason for this is that technological advancement. In such society where video, computers, and the Internet became daily must items, persuing ideals of study is to use those methods.
However, using computers and the Internet for students' study often can distract them from real learning. As a matter of fact, some students use Internet to talk with their friends and playing computer games instead of real learning.
- 1名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/12(月) 22:21:55
- トピ：Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
-----------------------------------------
Generally, educators have duty to find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. However, it is sometimes not true. Because not all of the educators pay much attention to their students. Sometimes, they offer students unrelated curriculum. Thus, in those cases, students have to find what they truely need to study and should find how to deal with their own problems properly.
Some students have great endeavor in their own study, without their teachers, they already know what they should to learn. And they can find their own way. Bill Gates had invented Microsoft office, and gained both wealth and fame. But he did not finish his university, and he dropped out. When he was a university student, he already decided to has his own company. He was very enthusiastic about software development without any direction from his teacher. This example can fully shows us what is important for students' future career. Educators' directions are important, but it is not necessarily. Students' willingness is the most important factor for their success in study and future career.
In addition to this, Thomas Edison is also a very good example for self-enlightenment. He is well-known for his great inventions such as light bulbs, electricity generator, phonographs and so on. But he did not even finish his elementary education. His elementary school teacher does not like him, and made him left the school. But he did not give up and studied at library. After several struggles, he became one of the greatest engineer ever live. This example can show us, students can do their study without directions from their teachers.
On the other, most students are normal person. They do not have extremely high IQ. And they can not do very good by themselves, so they need educators find out curriculum and then offer it to them. But as long as they do not interested with curriculum, they still can not study very well. Educators can offer them curriculum does not mean they can study well.
Ultimately, after considering both sides of the issue, it must be concluded that educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them is not a good idea. Because students' success in study and future career depends by their diligence and willingness toward their study. No matter how good the curriculum were or how good teacher can teaching, the choice of whether to study or not to study depends by students themselves.
(421 words)
- 2名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/13(火) 21:01:46
- トピ：The market for the luxury-goods industry is on the decline. Recent reports show that a higher unemployment rate, coupled with consumer fears, has decrease the amount of money the average household spends on both essential and nonessential items, but especially on nonessential items. Sinece luxury goods are, by nature, nonessential, this market will be the first to decrease in the present economic climate, and luxury retailers should refocuse their attention to lower-priced markets.
The argument that the market for the luxury-goods industry is on the decline is not entirely logically convincing, since it ignores certain crucial assumptions.
First, the argument assumes that luxury goods are, by nature, nonessential, this market will be the first to decrease in the present economic climate, and luxury retailers should refocus their attention to lower-priced markets. This argument lacks sources or evidence and went directly to a generalization. There is not enough evidence can show that if the market decrease then luxury retailers should refocus their attention to lower-priced markets.
Second, the argument never addresses the point that the average sales' profit versus the gross profit of the luxurious items'. There is must be a big difference. This argument should make a comparison between these two things first,
Finally, the argument omits the other components of non essential categories. Non essential categories do not only contain luxury goods, but also contain other goods such as alcoholic drink, cigarette and so on.
Thus, the argument is not completely sound. The evidence in support of the conclusion that luxury retailers should refocus their attention to lower-priced markets does little to prove that conclusion, since it does not address the assumptions already raised. Ultimately, the argument might have been strengthened if the author could have shown that the argument can be stated specific market trends for a period of time.(233 words)
- 3名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/13(火) 22:25:53
- アンサー２：The argument that the market for the luxury-goods industry is on the decline is not entirely logically convincing, since it ignores certain crucial assumptions.
First, the argument assumes that luxury goods are, by nature, nonessential, this market will be the first to decrease in the present economic climate, and luxury retailers should refocus their attention to lower-priced markets. This argument lacks sources or evidence and went directly to a generalization. There is not enough evidence can show that if the market decrease then luxury retailers should refocus their attention to lower-priced markets. It might have ended up there in some other way. For example, in some cases, even the market decreased, there are still some rich people want to buy luxury goods. Then, there is no need for luxury retailers should refocus their attention to lower-priced markets. And to strengthened this argument, a study about the rate of luxury good in the market must be published to provide more information to luxury retailers.
Second, the argument never addresses the point that the average sales' profit versus the gross profit of the luxurious items'. There is must be a big difference between the average sales' profit with luxurious items'. This argument should make a comparison between these two different things first. And, There must be a concrete evidence that the total revenues or sales of the luxury items really differ from its total earnings. Because luxury goods in the market are said to have high income elasticity of demand: as people become wealthier, they will buy more and more of the luxury good. This also means, however, that should there be a decline in income its demand will drop.
Finally, the argument omits the other components of non essential categories. Non essential categories do not only contain luxury goods, but also contain other goods such as alcoholic drink, cigarette and so on. The conclusion is only focused on luxury goods, and do not take account for other non essential goods. Thus, in order to strengthen the argument,the author should provide more information about other non essential categories.It makes the argument more reliable.
From what I have mentioned above, the argument is not completely sound. The evidence in support of the conclusion that luxury retailers should refocus their attention to lower-priced markets does little to prove that conclusion, since it does not address the assumptions already raised. Ultimately, the argument might have been strengthened if the author could have shown that the argument can be stated specific market trends for a period of time.(424 words)
- 4名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/16(金) 23:01:31
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at least some of the year, for the ice to cover the sea separating the islands, allowing the deer to travel over it. Unfortunately, according to reports from local hunters, the deer populations are declining. Since these reports coincide with recent global warming trends that have caused the sea ice to melt, we can conclude that the purported decline in deer populations is the result of the deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
トピAnswer:
The reporter's claim that decline in deer populations is the result of the deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea contains several logical flaws, and lends little credibility. Rather than relying solely on groundless reasoning, the reporter needs to consider the following points before making a final conclusion.
First and foremost, the whole reasoning of the report is based upon an assumption that the arctic deer's population will not change much over time. Let us think about a situation where the population of the arctic deer is increasing each year by 1.2 fold. Despite the fact that deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea and decrease, the increase in population will obviously lead to an total increase of the arctic deer's population in the end. Situations like this would weaken the validity of the reporter's claim, and in order to verify the claim, detailed investigation on this point must be addressed.
Second, although the reporter mentioned that deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen made the population of the arctic deer decline, he or she did not touch upon the other types of cause such as environment pollution, predatory animals and so on. The reporter must be aware of the fact that change in age-old migration patterns is just one of the cause. It is true that this change will cause decline in deer's population. However, the cause of other factors are also comparably large. If further investigation of the decline of the arctic deer showed that such other cause are also being counted as much as change in age-old migration patterns, then, the reporter's claim would become more convincing.
- 5名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/16(金) 23:01:56
- トピAnswer:
Third, the reporter insisted that according to reports from local hunters, the deer populations are declining. If most hunters in Canada's arctic regions have responded to the survey, it will be a considerable number. However, there is a possibility that only small fraction of the hunters' population- those who really care about the decline of the deer's population. If that is the case, the opinion of a small group of the regions' population won't represent the consensus opinion of the entire Canada's arctic regions. It is not acceptable to assume a trend based on the response of a handful of people and treat that propensity as a representation of the entire regions' population. If these statistics were still to be used as supporting data, the reporter would have to ensure that the survey results represent the voice of a significant proposition of the entire population..
Fourth, the reporter assumes that decline in deer populations is the result of the deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea. Whether this trend is the indication of the deer's population decline or simply a temporary trend is not clear. At least, at this point, it is too soon to conclude that this trend is due to an ongoing decline in deer's populations.
As discussed above, the reporter's claim is based on several assumptions that are not sufficiently supported. Before arriving at the final conclusion, the reporter should acknowledge that there are many factors that are involved in this story, and undertake additional investigation to clarify the uncertainties pointed out above.(573 words)
- 6名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/09/16(金) 23:36:41
- change変わり
First and foremost, the whole reasoning of the report is based upon an assumption that the arctic deer's population will not change much over time. Let us think about a situation where the population of the arctic deer is decreasing each year by 0.8 fold. Despite the fact that deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea and decrease, the decrease in population will obviously lead to an total decrease of the arctic deer's population in the end. Situations like this would weaken the validity of the reporter's claim, and in order to verify the claim, detailed investigation on this point must be addressed.
6 English Japanese Language Exchange - 交換する (Res : 10)
- 1名前：Mark 投稿日：2016/08/01(月) 18:08:07
- こんにちは
アメリカか育て日系人です。今東京に住んでいます。
日本語を話せるけど、英語の方がペラペラです。
私は日本語日本語を勉強して、沢山友達を作りたいと思っています。
英語と日本語でお互い教えあいましょう。よろしくお願いします。
Japanese American looking for new friends for language exchange in Tokyo.
- 4名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/27(土) 11:57:14
- トピック：There are many super markets in Japan and the super markets are not only open during the daytime, but also open in the middle night. It is really convenience, and you can buy any food you want to eat at the super markets. Time has changed, those things will never happened just 10 years before in Japan. In addition of this, you can buy food anywhere you want to buy. You can buy a sandwich in a convenience store inner the station while you are hungry, and you can buy a salad in McDonald. You can even have a cup of coffee in the library's coffee shop! You can buy foods everywhere in Japan. In my opinion, I really born in a good age. I hope there is no war and I can keep my life in safe, quiet, and I can eat as many food as I can.
Last but not the least, fast food sells in super market is tasty and cheaper than having dishes in some authentic restaurant. I like to eat spaghetti, especially peperoncino. I went to a authenticate Italian restaurant near my house and ordered a dish of peperoncino, after that, I buy a frozen peperoncino spaghetti in a super market near my house, too. After comparing those two foods, I think a frozen peperoncino spaghetti is better than the restaurant serves. The frozen peperoncino spaghetti was really tasty and cheap. I hear a lot of fast food industries in Japan focus on how to make a tasty and cheap frozen food. I impressed by their efforts.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, prepared food can save our time, easy to obtain and they also tasty and cheap. I think there is no doubt that food has become easier to prepare and this change improved the way people live. (561 words)
- 5名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/27(土) 12:52:10
- トピック：Do you agree or disagree with the dollowing statement? only people who earn a lot of money are successful. Use specfic reasons and examples to support your answer.
This is a difficult topic because this topic is a very controversial problem and it doesn't have a clear answer. Some people will agree with the idea that people who earn a lot of money are successful. While other people disagree with the idea that people who earn a lot of money are successful. Personally, I agree with this topic for the following three reasons.
First of all, people earn a lot of money can do everything they want to do. Rich people are afford to buy luxurious sport cars and expensive jewelry. In addition to this, they can also go everywhere they want to go. Do whatever they want to do such as build a house, build a movie theater and have a swimming pool in their own house. Although have huge amount of money doesn't mean that you can have everything in this world such as youth and love. But you can manage to do it, such as make a scientific laboratory and hire many scientist to find a new solution for youth, and buy a expensive presents to someone you fall in love. If you were poor, you will even lose those important opportunity. You can also spend your money to help people in trouble, such as contribute the money to African country so that they can build schools. Many children in those countries can't receive a good education due to poverty, but the schools will give them a chance to study. Through this kind of donation, it will surely bring happiness to your life and make your life more colorful.
The next reason is that people earn a lot of money will have surplus time, especially those who inherited wealth from their parents. Having enough money means you don't have to work. Once you are free, you could avail yourself of every opportunity to entertain. You can go some exotic place, meet exotic people and play around with them. It must be a spice of your life. As for me, I am working as a software developer and I am always very busy for my job, if I have enough time to play around, I want to keep playing video games 24 hour! It surely will be a fantastic life.
Last but not the least people earn a lot of money will have a lot of friends. People with fame means their also famous. For example, a lot of celebrities in Japan have a lot of friends. I can even say that everyone want to be friends with those people. However, some people will have bad intention to approach those famous people such as want to they use money on undesirable investment and buy some expensive medicine. So, the rich people in Japan always choosing their friends very carefully.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, people earn a lot of money can do everything they want to do, will have surplus time and will have a lot of friends. I totally agree with the idea that people who earn a lot of money are successful.(515 words)
- 6名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/27(土) 13:28:05
- トピック：You can also spend your money to help people who are in trouble, such as contribute the money to African country so that they can build schools. Many children in those countries can't receive a good education due to poverty, but the schools will give them a chance to study. Through this kind of donation, it will surely bring happiness to your life and make your life more colorful.
The next reason is that people earn a lot of money will have surplus time, especially those who inherited wealth from their parents. Having enough money means you don't have to work. Once you are free, you could avail yourself of every opportunity to entertain. You can go some exotic place, meet exotic people and play around with them. It must be a spice of your life. As for me, I am working as a software developer and I am always very busy for my job, if I have enough time to play around, I want to keep playing video games 24 hour! It surely will be a fantastic life.
Last but not the least people earn a lot of money will have a lot of friends. People with fame means their also famous. For example, a lot of celebrities in Japan have a lot of friends. I can even say that everyone want to be friends with those people. However, some people will have bad intention to approach those famous people such as want to they use money on undesirable investment and buy some expensive medicine. So, the rich people in Japan always choosing their friends very carefully.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, people earn a lot of money can do everything they want to do, will have surplus time and will have a lot of friends. I totally agree with the idea that people who earn a lot of money are successful.(515 words)
- 7名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/27(土) 13:54:34
- トピック：Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends. Other choose to spend time with a large number of friends. Compare the advantages of each choice. Which of these two ways of spending time do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your answer.
This is a difficult topic and it doesn't have a clear answer. In my opinion it depends on the type of your friends and the circumstances. Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends. While other people choose to spend time with a large number of friends. Personally, I want to choose the former solution for the following three reasons.
First of all, I have few friends, thus spend time with a large number of friends is physically impossible. And not only me, I think many young people in Japan, they became more and more introvertial. The main reason for this is that today's society is an informationalized society, and many young people try to communicate other people with Internet or some gadget. Thus, they became less to interact with people who live in their real life. As for me, I am working as a software developer, and many of my co-workers are also addicted in SNS such as Twitters, Facebook and so on. They usually use those software
- 8名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/27(土) 14:39:57
- 続き：The main reason for this is that today's society is an informationalized society, and many young people try to communicate other people with Internet or some gadgets. Thus, they became less to interact with people who live in their real life. As for me, I am working as a software developer, and many of my co-workers are also addicted in SNS such as Twitters, Facebook and so on. They usually use those software to establish connection between other people. It can be said that they have more friends through Internet than friends in their real life. But, both my co-workers and I want to have a lot of friends in real life someday. We are really eager to make friends.
The next reason is that it will be easier for you to spend time with one or two close friends than spend time with a large number of friends. I am an introvert person, and I can't get along with people easily. A large number of friends means there are must be someone you don't know him or her very well. In my opinion, I think close friends can make me feel much more at ease because they are very predictable. On the other hand, being together with some people you don't know them very well will be a stressful thing.
Last but not the least, you can share same interest with one or two close friends. There is a proverb says that "Great minds think alike". This means two people reaching the same conclusion in any manner at the same time. Your close friends will have the same idea and interest as you have. And spend time with your favorite, close friends together will also deepen friendship between you and your friends. You can not only share same interest with your friends, but you can also doing homework and research with your friends together. Through those events, you can learn each other with your close friends and growing with your friends together.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, spend time with one or two close friends is physically impossible for me and many young people in Japan. Spend time with one or two close friends will be easier for me than spend time with a large number of friends and you can share same interest with your close friends. I prefer to spend time with one or two close friends.(510 words)
- 9名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/27(土) 15:18:21
- トピック：If you could meet a famous entertainer or athlete, who would that be, and why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
This is a bit difficult question for me because I neither interested in watching TV shows or playing sports. So, I can't choose a famous entertainer or athlete. If I could meet a famous person, the top on my list is definitely, Einstein. I have a couple of reasons for choosing him. I will explain those reasons for the following reasons.
First of all, he is not only one of the greatest scientists ever lived in this world, but he is also my hero. It's like a lot of kids respect professional football players. When I first read the theory of relativity, I was so impressed by its originality although it was very difficult to me. And I really would like to talk to him and ask a lot of questions about his theory someday. And my future dream is become a great scientists like him. I want to Invent a lot of things which are useful to mankind. But I guess I am not an intelligent person as him, and I decided to just study hard and work hard. Through those diligent work, I want to succuss in the future. And I decided to go to abroad for further and deeper study. Some people ask me why you study so hard, I always answer them because I have my own dream. I study hard for the purpose of purchasing my own dream.
The next reason is that I also respect his human side. Some people think he invented an atomic bomb, but it's not true. According to some of his biographies, actually, he was acted against nuclear weapons and claimed world peace. He claimed that every creature living on the earth is a only one, America should not use nuclear weapons because it will cause mass of death.
Last but not the least he is keenly aware of scientific problems and always made a sensible result based on the awareness. He also always made wise hypothesis for the future with great imagination and intelligence. Here is an amazing news that I have read from Japanese news paper, it described that gravitational waves detected 100 years after Einstein's prediction. Finally, his hypothesis was proved after his death! Many scientist were impressed by this new discovery based on Einstein's prediction, some of them did a big exclamation of admiration. And I also very surprised by this new. In my opinion, I think some day gravitational waves's theory will be proved but not in this century, may be next century. Nowaday's technology advancement is really changing rapidly.
In conclusion, from what I mentioned above, Einstein is not only one of the greatest scientists ever lived in this world, but he is also my hero. I also respect his human side and he always made wise hypothesis for the future with great imagination. If you could meet a famous person, I definitely want to choose Einstein.(490 words)
- 10名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/27(土) 15:56:29
- トピック：I study hard for the purpose of purchasing my own dream.
The next reason is that I also respect his human side. Some people think he invented an atomic bomb, but it's not true. According to some of his biographies, actually, he was acted against nuclear weapons and claimed world peace. He claimed that every creature living on the earth is a only one, America should not use nuclear weapons because it will cause mass of death.
Last but not the least he is keenly aware of scientific problems and always made a sensible result based on the awareness. He also always made wise hypothesis for the future with great imagination and intelligence. Here is an amazing news that I have read from Japanese news paper, it described that gravitational waves detected 100 years after Einstein's prediction. Finally, his hypothesis was proved after his death! Many scientist were impressed by this new discovery based on Einstein's prediction, some of them did a big exclamation of admiration. And I also very surprised by this new. In my opinion, I think some day gravitational waves's theory will be proved but not in this century, may be next century. Nowaday's technology advancement is really changing rapidly.
In conclusion, from what I mentioned above, Einstein is not only one of the greatest scientists ever lived in this world, but he is also my hero. I also respect his human side and he always made wise hypothesis for the future with great imagination. If you could meet a famous person, I definitely want to choose Einstein.(490 words)
7 english study( トフル writting) (Res : 16)
- 1名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/13(土) 16:12:09
- トピック:Nowadays people spend more and more time on their smartphones. Do you agree that smartphones provide a positive influence for us? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In my opinion, 21 century could be called Information century. Almost citizens in Japan have their own smartphones. Personally,I agree that smartphones provide a positive influence for us for the following three reasons.
The first reason is that smartphones can make our life more convenient. As for me, if I have some questions such as what is the right route can bring me to the station, I think the best solution for this problem is to use smartphones search through Internet. I can get my answer not only quickly but also accurately. Not only about me, I think even the elderly people can get benefits through using smartphones. Although many elder people can't use smartphones adequately, but I always recommend my parents to use smartphone. There are lots of coupon site on web-market. And i think my parents can buy goods which have good quality and always cheaper than supermarkets near my house. I can add a one more reasonable reason. Recently, there are a lot of Languages Schools are established through Internet. And I also learning English at those school. I can practice and improve my English ability through Skype. There are just too many good examples to show that smartphones are convenient in our daily life.
The second reason is that smartphones can make our life more colorful. There are a lot of application which I can download in my smartphones. Not only I can obtain game applications but I can also obtain some useful application such as household management application. Through this application, I can deal with my financial problems, and I can calculate my daily expenses such as electrical appliance, rents and so on. As I mentioned before there are also a lot of application such as Skype can be used at daily communication, languages acquisition. Through recent technology advancement, I can also use my smartphones as a remote control device to control my TV and air conditioner. Such application can really be the spice of my life. I really enjoy to use it! There are a lot of interesting application in smartphone. I always talk with my co-workers about those interesting application.
The final reason is that smartphones can make deepen friendship between me and my friends. I can connect to people around the world through using a smartphones, and actually, I made a lot of friend in foreign countries such as Russian, America, Canada, Korean and so on. Every time we have conversation with them through Skype or line, I think I really born in a good time. Besides, through using smartphones, I think I not only can talk people all over the world but I can also talk to them at anytime as I can. From early morning to middle of the night. And I can talk to them when I am in station or at library, at university, at my own house. Every time I chitchat with my friend, the topic maybe the school homework or some serious problem. I think I smartphone its really convenience and I am sure that I can deepen friendship with my friends through using smartphone. We can both communicate through Line(an instant message exchange tool) or just through a single phone call.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above: smartphones can make our life more convenient, colorful and can deepen friendship between me and my friends. I strongly agree with idea that smartphones provide a positive influence for modern citizens.(575 words)
- 10名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/18(木) 09:05:00
- トピック：Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better? Use specific reasons and exampes to support your answer.
This topic is a difficult questions and it doesn't have a clear answer. Some people would prefer some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. While other people would prefer universities require students to specialize in one subject. In my opinion, I would choose specialize in one subject for the following three reasons.
First of all, specialize in one subject can save students time. As for me, now I am a software developer. While I am a students, I have already decided my future career, become a software engineer. I was really addicted in playing video games when I am in high school. That is the main reason why I chose computer science as my major. Not only me, a lot of students in computer science department say that they decided to be a software engineer because their loved in playing video games, from such experience, they decided to develop some amazing software in the future. In may opinion, I think it is waste of time if I take other subjects such as art, sculpture. They are totally unrelated to my major and it is useless to spend much time on such major.
The next reason is that, specialize in one subject is good for students' future career. As for me, I think focus on computer science related subject is the best choice for students if they have already decided their future career. If you focused on one subject, that means you can concentrate on it. Thus, students can be more skillful through such process, and can have enough time to participate interns in some famous IT company. This will make their resume looks better. If you can specialized in your subject and have a lot of experience on such subject. I believe that you can truly find a good job.
Last but not the least, specialize in one subject can deepen students' expertise knowledge. Although I was only in one subject, computer science. There is a wide range of knowledge in this field such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, big data, wireless network, computer vision, data mining and so on. It was really difficult for me to study all of those expertise knowledge. I am working as a software developer for 8 years. But until now, I think I am still not good at many field of computer science. It is impossible for me to take classes in many subjects. If I can focus only at computer science, if will surely deepen my expertise knowledge. I want become a data scientist someday.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, specialize in one subject can save students time, good for students' future career and deepen students' expertise knowledge. I would prefer to choose specialize in one subject. (461 words)
- 11名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/18(木) 09:29:55
- トピック：CORRECTED!!!:Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better? Use specific reasons and exampes to support your answer.
This topic is a difficult questions and it doesn't have a clear answer. Some people would prefer some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. While other people would prefer universities require students to specialize in one subject. In my opinion, I would choose specialize in one subject for the following three reasons.
First of all, specializing in one subject can save students time and efforts. As for me, now I am a software developer. While I was a student, I have already decided something for my future career which is to become a software engineer. I was really addicted in playing video games when I was in high school. That was the main reason why I chose computer science as my major. Not only me, but there are also a lot of students in computer science department said that they decided to be a software engineer because their intrest is in playing video games. From such experience, they decided to develop some amazing software in the future. In my opinion, I think it is a waste of time if I take other subjects such as art, sculpture, etc. They are totally unrelated to my major and it is useless to spend much time on such major.
The next reason is that specializing in one subject is good for students' future career. As for me, I think focusing on computer science related subject is the best choice for students if they have already decided their future career. If you focused on one subject, that means you can concentrate on it and you can also widen your knowledge about that particular subject. Thus, students can be more skillful through such process, and can have enough time to participate interns in some famous IT companies. This will make their resume looks better and presentable. If you can specialized in your subject and have a lot of experience on it. I believe that you can truly find a good job.
Last but not the least, specializing in one subject can deepen students' expertise knowledge. I took only one subject which is computer science. There is a wide range of knowledge in this field such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, big data, wireless network, computer vision, data mining and so on. It was really difficult for me to study all of those expertise knowledge. I am working as a software developer for 8 years. But until now, I think I am still not good at many field of computer science because I took many subject which is not related to my major. It is impossible for me to take classes in many subjects. If I can focus only at computer science, I will surely deepen my expertise knowledge. I want to become a data scientist someday.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, specializing in one subject can save students time, good for students' future career and deepen students' expertise knowledge. That is why I would prefer to choose specializing in one subject. (503 words)
- 12名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/18(木) 11:03:51
- トピック： a friend of yours has received some money and plans to use all of it either 1.to go on vacation 2.to buy a car. Your friends has asked you for advice. Compare your friends's two choices and explain which one you think your friend should choose.Usee specific reasons and details to support your choice.
This is a difficult question because both go on vacation and buy a car have its merits and demerits. Some people would prefer to use money to go on vacation. While other people would prefer to use money to buy a car. Personally, I would choose to go on vacation for the following three reasons.
First of all, go on vacation can relieve my friend from his or her daily working stress. As for me, I am working as a software developer. Software development is one of the hardest job in Japan. I always very busy for my job and some of my co-workers can't tolerate such extreme conditions. Many of them decided to quit the job or just become mental disorder, but I really want to persistent on my own job because I have already worked as a software developer more than 8 years. I will never give up my career and sometimes I need play around to relieve my stress. I think go on vacation is the best solution for this problem. So I will recommend my friends(He or she is a software developer, too) to go on vacation.
The second reason is that go on vacation can make my friend's life more colorful. There are a lot of traveling companies which offering a wide range of tours in Japan. You can go anywhere you want to go. Not only the famous countries around the world such as Italy, France, America and so on. But you can also go to mysterious and unexplored regions such as Himalayas, tahiti, etc. It can stimulate my friend's life and can be a spice of he or she's life. There are a lot of countries that my friend can visit. But the top on my list must be Bora Bora island. Bora bora island is a small coral island located in tahiti. You can enjoy the beach resort and diving there. The specialty of Bora Bora island is that you can diving with sharks. It must be a rare experience for you.
Last but not at least, go on vacation to many countries can broaden my friend's cultural horizons and experience horizons. If my friends can go to many countries and meet with people especially who have different cultural and educational back ground with he or she. It can surely broaden his or her cultural horizons and can deepen his or her point of view. They can improve their understatement towards different culture. This experience can also improve his or her inter personal skill and can make them know how to deal with people different from him or her properly. If you go to abroad, you must experience some culture shocks. Nowadays is a internationalized age, it is very important for you to know people from different country.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, go on vacation can relieve my friend from his or her daily working stress, can make my friend's life more colorful and can broaden my friend's cultural horizons and experience horizons. I really recommend my friends to choose to go on vacation.(525 words)
- 13名前：topi 投稿日：2016/08/24(水) 07:07:44
- トピック
You have decided to give several hours of your time each month to improve the community where you live. What is one thing you will do to improve your community? Why? Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice.
Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to develop your essay.
- 14名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/25(木) 22:05:22
- トピック：You have decided to give several hours of your time each month to improve the community where you live. What is one thing you will do to improve your community? Why? Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice.
There are many things that I want to do to improve the community where I live. For example, pick up garbage threw in the sea coast line, help elderly people, teaching basic computer programming to children who live in the neighborhood. Personally, I would like teaching children about basic computer programming in the neighborhood for the following three reasons.
First of all, we can say today's society is information society, if children acquired basic computer programming skill then it will be helpful for them. After the acquisition of the skills, it must be advantage for children for their education and future career. Japanese government has decided computer programming be a required subject from elementary school education because Japanese government want to strengthen their IT industries. If children can learn some basic computer programming skill, this not only means they can finish their school work easier, but also means they match their government needs and will become a talented person in future IT field. IT field is one of the most famous field of jobs and you can have high salary compare to other field. IT fields is one of the most famous fields of jobs and you can have high salary compare to other field. If you have inborn talent at computer programming you can also invent some specific software, and have your own company. These means you will have great opportunity for success. You will obtain both fame and wealth if you can invent a proper software. There are a lot of billionaire around the world for their own software invention, such as Bill Gates, he made Microsoft office and he is obviously one of the most successful entrepreneur in IT filed. Other good example is Mark Zuckerberg who is also a famous entrepreneur in IT field. He is famous for invented Facebook. I think invent a useful software is easy and fast way for young people who want to be success compare to other industries. It is really important for young children to start study with computer programming in their young age.
The next reason is that basic computer programming skill can improve children's logical thinking ability. As a proverb says that killing two birds with one stone. You can acquire both basic computer programming skill and logical thinking ability through this kind of learning process. Because computer programming is based on the basic algorithm and basic algorithm is based on the basic logical thinking. If you are good at logical thinking you will be good at science soon.
Last but not the least, in my opinion, I think if I can teach basic computer programming to children, thus means I can improve my teaching skill. I want to gain a teaching assistant position if I can study abroad. It will be really helpful for me to teaching young children before teaching at a university. Through this kind of teaching process I think it can definitely improve my teaching skill. And I can acquire a lot of teaching experience and I can learn how to interact with my students properly. It must be advantage for me through teaching children living in the neighborhood.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above, I would like teaching children about basic computer programming in the neighborhood. ( 524 words)
- 15名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/25(木) 22:56:56
- トピック：Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to develop your essay.
This is a difficult topic and it doesn't have a clear answer. Because this topic depends by the person's personality and the situations surrounding you. If you're independent person then it will be better for you to learn by yourself. On the other hand, if you aren't want to study by yourself then it will be better for you to learn from a teacher. Personally, I would like to choose learn from a teacher for the following three reasons.
First of all, in my opinion, I think learn from a teacher can save your time. Although we can improve our skill in certain filed by ourselves, but we can acquire skill faster if we can hear someone's advice, especially from a well experienced teacher. For example, when I am in a high school, I really want to improve my chemistry score because I am not very good at chemistry. First, I try to ask my friends if I had some questions about chemistry homework because I just don't like my chemistry teacher. He speaks too fast and it makes me can't understand what he said very well. Then, I asked one of my best friends about the homework of chemistry. She can't give me a reasonable and persuasive answer. Finally, I decided to ask my chemistry teacher. And from that I convinced my answer. Through this experience, I think it is the fastest way to ask your teacher when you have some questions about your school work.
The next reason is that learn from a teacher especially he or she is a professor and he or she is the expert of certain field will be the easiest way when you have questions about your own dissertation. While I am writing the dissertation for the national conference such as IEEE, I always be afraid of the quality of my dissertation. When I came up with this kind of problem, the best choice for me to solve this question is very simple. Just send an email to your teacher! Let he or she check your dissertation. I think you will surely get a persuasive answer quickly, precisely and accurately.
Last but not the least, you can learn not only the knowledge from your teacher but also you can learn the great personality from your teacher. For example, my best English teacher's name is Van. She has great English skill. Whenever I have had some grammar, pronunciation and vocabulary questions. She always answer me quickly and accurately with great explanations. And she also has an amiable smile when she teaching me English. She is not only enthusiastic about teaching English but she also has a great personality. When I was nervous and negative about taking the toefl exam, she was kind and sympathetic to me. She gave me some helpful advice and kind words. I want to learn her attitude towards person who have trouble like me. After all, I became positive towards my study and passed the minimum required score of toefl for the entrance examination of my university. I really appreciated her from those kindness.
In conclusion, from what I have mentioned above. I think learn from a teacher can save your time, will be the easiest way for you to reach your academic goal and you can also learn personality from your teacher. I totally support choice that learn from a teacher. (555 words)
- 16名前：kelo 投稿日：2016/08/27(土) 07:26:49
- 修正後：This is a difficult topic and it doesn't have a clear answer. Because this topic depends on the person's personality and the situations surrounding you. If you're an independent person, then it will be better for you to learn by yourself. On the other hand, if you don't want to study by yourself, then it will be better for you to learn from a teacher. Personally, I would like to choose learn from a teacher for the following three reasons.
- 1名前：あんな 投稿日：2016/07/24(日) 17:08:30
- 初めまして。
英語講師をしているあんなと申します。
書店に行くと、色々な単語帳があるし、色んな勉強法があるし、何から始めていいか分からないという方、スカイプで英語を勉強してみませんか。
英会話のアドバイス、Toeic,英語文法、を中心に教えたいと思います。
受講料は一回（90分）1000円です。初回はお試しなので、アドバイスだけでも承ります。
興味があったらメールください。(miya10171987@yahoo.co.jp)
宜しくお願い致します
9 春からはじめる英会話レッスン (Res : 2)
- 1名前：【ML新未来中国語教室】 投稿日：2016/03/25(金) 17:40:39
- 英会話に興味のある方、カフェでマンツーマンレッスンはいかがですか？
マンツーマンなので、英会話を初めて習う方でも以前習っていた方でも、あなたに合ったレベルで学習できます。TOEICやその他検定対策講座やサロン授業も実施しております。
入会金、会費、講師紹介料は全て無料です。授業料は60分3,000円とお手ごろ価格。都度払いOKなので、契約期間の縛りがありません。その他、回数券制度でされにお得に授業を受けることもできます。
入会時に教科書（3,500円相当）を無料進呈。各種検定合格者に奨励制度もあります。
自由予約制なので、ご自分のペースでレッスンを受けられます。レッスンは六本木にある教室か、都内の各カフェで受講可能です。
現在、60分無料マンツーマン体験レッスン実施中です。
中国語、韓国語のレッスンも行っております。
英会話講師同時募集中！
募集要項
・アメリカ、イギリス、オーストラリア、カナダ等の英語圏出身の方で、教えることに対して熱意のある方。
・日本人で英語を教えた経験がある方も大歓迎です。
・英語を教えた経験がある方（１年以上）。
生徒と一緒に授業を楽しみましょう！
英会話の勉強を通して、欧米の歴史や文化、話題の映画や音楽などの話で盛り上がりましょう。
お問い合わせはこちら
【ML新未来中国語教室】
ＴＥＬ：０３－６４３４－７９０３
E-mail: shinmirai@maylingchinese.jp
URL:http://www.maylingchinese.jp/
- 2名前：【ML新未来中国語教室】 投稿日：2016/07/14(木) 15:32:36
- 英会話に興味のある方、カフェでマンツーマンレッスンはいかがですか？
マンツーマンなので、英会話を初めて習う方でも以前習っていた方でも、あなたに合ったレベルで学習できます。TOEICやその他検定対策講座やサロン授業も実施しております。
入会金、会費、講師紹介料は全て無料です。授業料は60分3,000円とお手ごろ価格。都度払いOKなので、契約期間の縛りがありません。その他、回数券制度でされにお得に授業を受けることもできます。
教科書（3,500円相当）無料進呈制度や、各種検定合格者に奨励制度もあります。
自由予約制なので、ご自分のペースでレッスンを受けられます。レッスンは六本木にある教室か、都内の各カフェで受講可能です。
現在、60分無料マンツーマン体験レッスン実施中です。
中国語、韓国語のレッスンも行っております。
英会話講師同時募集中！
募集要項
・アメリカ、イギリス、オーストラリア、カナダ等の英語圏出身の方で、教えることに対して熱意のある方。
・日本人で英語を教えた経験がある方も大歓迎です。
・英語を教えた経験がある方（１年以上）。
（省略されました・・全てを読むにはここを押してください）
10 初心者専門マンツーマン英会話教室 (Res : 1)
- 1名前：名無しさん 投稿日：2016/01/15(金) 20:30:51
池袋にて通訳・翻訳業の傍ら英会話教室を開いております。（遠方の方でもオンラインレッスンを承っております。）
バイリンガルの講師と教科書や資格試験等にとらわれない生きた英会話を一緒に楽しみませんか？
90分×月に4回のレッスンで月謝は1万円となっております。 入会金やテキスト代等の追加料金は一切頂いておりません。
初歩の初歩からだけど大丈夫ですか？ ついていけますか？ と不安かもしれまんせんが、丁寧にご指導させていただきます。
御連絡お待ちしております。
堀口大輔
